« Assumptions Lead to Negotiating Pitfalls | Main | Antagonism as a Negotiating Tactic »

March 5, 2006

Arguing

Arguing is a destructive by-product of human interaction. Between nations, it can lead to war and mayhem. Between couples it can lead to pain and divorce. Negotiating is very different than arguing.

Arguing or fighting typically ends with the proponents trying to obliterate each other by out-shouting or simply shooting the other to end the argument. This amounts to screaming over the other's words to the point that nothing is heard by anyone. Seeking to overpower the other person may result in the other person simply walking away from the situation. If so, nothing is solved. No one wins.

When involved in a marital or family argument, understand that every person has differing personality traits that impact how they deal with anger. One important difference is the time it takes to get over a fight. Many of us get mad quickly but get over it just as quickly. Others are slow to ignite but simmer for days!

A couple needs to learn the "anger" pattern of the other. This difference will explain reactions and enable the couple to better understand each other. Respect is a key part of any relationship. Granting enough time or space for the other party to cool off is part of respecting their needs. Demanding the argument end on your timing is to selfishly want things your way and is not the way to end an argument. It often will result in a far greater argument than the original issue.

When conflicts between a parent and child or a husband and wife repeatedly escalate beyond control, destructive words and acts often become the norm. This mutual abuse slowly destroys the underlying relationship. Even though the more powerful parent may prevail, the underlying war will ultimately be lost as the core feelings that bind the family relationship may eventually be killed off. As a parent you need to try to control the situation and keep the discussions focused on the matter at hand rather than allow personal attacks to overshadow the core issue.

In business it is not acceptable to kill one's opponent!

Business conflict is typically resolved through negotiation. Whether the negotiation is over an employee's conduct, a supervisor's actions, a building lease or pay raise, the process is the same.

It stands to reason that the most effective negotiators are those with absolute power and the willingness to use it! Few people have absolute power. The rest of us must work to develop tools and techniques to improve their negotiating results.

Managers who demand compliance leave employees with two choices. They can knuckle under, accept the situation, and stay to make the money necessary to feed their family. Or they can fight back. Rather than quitting and jeopardizing their family's subsistence, they simply start seeking another job. By learning of other options the employee has grasped the power to decide whether to stay or leave. If the decision is to leave, the manager will have to become reasonable or accept the loss of an employee and the cost of finding and training a replacement.

In taking the initiative to seek another job, the employee is establishing his or her value on the open market. Knowing that worth empowers the employee with choices and forces the company to either acknowledge that value or lose it.

While arguing is not an effective negotiating tool, prolonged discussions designed to wear the other party down on issues can be an effective negotiating tactic. Learn to control your temper and extend discussions to gather information or wear down the other party. Losing your temper will have the opposite effect.

Posted by Bill at March 5, 2006 9:40 AM

Comments

Interesting observations on arguing. Many hot tempered people do not have a lot of friends because people do not want to turn in angry people like them. It seems that anger can be addictive though - when the angry person is able to get what he/she wants. What are your tips in dealing with angry people by not arguing yourself?

Posted by: CompanyCounselor at May 1, 2006 12:45 PM

When confronted with anger a negotiator should seek the reason for the anger. Anger can be real, can reflect frustration and can be feigned. It can also be a learned behavior. Once the cause of the anger is identified you will then be able to decide if you have the ability to dissipate the other person's ire.

If so and to do so does not impair your goal, do so and move on. It may be something you said or did that can easily be resolved. It may be a misunderstanding that can also be cleared up.

If it is not something that can be readily resolved, then you have to decide how to overcome the situation. It may mean changing tactics or negotiators. It may mean deciding you can not get past the issue.

In any event, you need to get to the reason for the anger before you can decide if you can overcome it.

Posted by: Bill at May 20, 2006 9:47 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?